Yes. Are you really that completely ignorant of the
1983 Betamax case? It's completely legal to tape for personal use, at least in the US (I'm aware I'm in a different country now, but still)
I don't generally "lend" my stuff to friends, no. I take the "personal use" part of "personal use" fairly seriously. What part of "personal use" are YOU having trouble with?
PS. What other people do is
not my responsibility, morally or legally. Cain had it right when he said (originally in question form) "I am not my brother's keeper."
Wasn't my intention to "protect" anyone, if I wanted to "protect" you I'd have called you all thieves and condemned your souls to hell for stealing.
I was reminding people that SOMEONE worked hard to make the things people download from torrents, whether it's a movie OR A LINUX DISTRO. It's irrelevant to what I said whether the torrent is being used to do something illegal or perfectly legal.
All I *actually said* was that if you download something that doesn't belong to you, you are morally obligated to pay for it unless it's been explicitly made clear that payment is not required. Even then, I donate to things like NeoOffice in order to SUPPORT THE WORK, not because I "should" or "have to" but because I want to.
Yes there is, and my comments apply EQUALLY to those uses -- if you use it, pay for it (by donation or other forms of support if no direct-compensation model is required). But to pretend that the vast majority of torrent use isn't for illegal copying is BS and undermines your credibility.
I'd love to hear a fuller explanation of what this remark means. Seriously.
a) what was my "solution"? Looking back over my post, I don't see where I advocated one. I suggested that if you take something, you pay for it. It's the same model I use at the grocery store, and works very well for all involved.
b) what is the "larger problem" caused by proposing that people pay for what they take from the content creator/copyright holder?