Canadian Mac Forums at ehMac banner
7241 - 7246 of 7246 Posts

·
peek-a-boo
Joined
·
17,094 Posts
I love how it declares its wealth of knowledge on this subject, after barraging us with just pure horseshit.

face it pal, there’s a reason why no one engages you here anymore, and merely mocks you.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
42,770 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7,242 ·
Huh. Silence. Suddenly not quite so sure of yourself, MacDoc? You shouldn't be.
When you use the IPCC reports as a Bible, you're opening yourself to significant error. When you use media articles on the IPCC reports as your sole source of information, you're almost certainly going to be wrong.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
23,397 Posts
When you use the IPCC reports as a Bible, you're opening yourself to significant error. When you use media articles on the IPCC reports as your sole source of information, you're almost certainly going to be wrong.
Thing is, TIPCC's AR's are s'pose to be the "gold standard" of climate information. Why does someone who fancies himself as informed on the topic not know the contents? Why does it take a lowly "denier" to actually cite the science and prove him wrong?

Curious thing about the AR's. If you go through the earlier versions, there is actually some decent science being conducted. The later versions are the ones that leave science behind in favour of politics.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
42,770 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7,245 ·
Curious thing about the AR's. If you go through the earlier versions, there is actually some decent science being conducted. The later versions are the ones that leave science behind in favour of politics.
The crazy accelerated timelines and the lack of humility over previous errors and failures are the hallmarks of the newer reports.

Steve Koonin, a former Obama climate scientist, wrote a recent climate book called Unsettled and says:

“We get information about climate science at the end of a long game of telephone. It starts with the data and research literature, goes through the assessment reports and their summaries to the media reporting. There are ample motives and opportunities for distortion at each step in that chain.”

That sums it up well.
 

·
peek-a-boo
Joined
·
17,094 Posts
The crazy accelerated timelines and the lack of humility over previous errors and failures are the hallmarks of the newer reports.

Steve Koonin, a former Obama climate scientist, wrote a recent climate book called Unsettled and says:

“We get information about climate science at the end of a long game of telephone. It starts with the data and research literature, goes through the assessment reports and their summaries to the media reporting. There are ample motives and opportunities for distortion at each step in that chain.”

That sums it up well.
Unless you're a scientist with peer reviewed studies, you're opinion is that of a dipstick. Both of you. It's a total joke either of you think you're smarter than the world's scientists with these credentials. You aren't "thinking for yourself", googling headlines or from right wing nonsense blogs mangling data means diddlysquat.

Morons.
 
7241 - 7246 of 7246 Posts
Top