In my [web development] experience, the pages presented to users by IE:Mac and IE:Win have little similarity. For a long time, IE:Mac was the best browser in the world for standards compatibility, but since the upstart Safari has lightly skipped onto the scene and all but annihilated Microsoft's slightly deformed, unpopular progeny, the quickly declining mutant is revealed to be less and less
future-compatible than it first appeared [see note]. Regardless, people still use it, and if you want to allow as much accessibility as possible (read: don't want to commit career suicide), you'll keep it kicking around, along with Camino, Netscape, OmniWeb, Mozilla, and the new Mozilla trunk, Firebird. (Note: I of course mean several versions of each. We'll look the other way if you decide to ditch the 4.x browsers, though...

)
My next task is to convince you to ditch Dreamweaver and start pounding out the markup by hand
(Seriously; DW, along with any other program like it, will inevitably produce horrid HTML that kicks standards-compliance in the shins in a few places, and outright sets it on fire in others. I pray for a decent program for people like
you, though [that don't want to bother learning SGMLs]; I myself am far too in love with hand-"coding" to waste my time using DW clones anymore)
Hope that helped in some small way.
Cheers,
Podboy
Note: though I realize that Safari's standards support is far from complete, I'm comparing it to IE here. Also note that when I say "all but annihilated", it's a Schroedinger statement: I may or may not be referring to actual statistics about Safari adoption and IE:Mac desertion. It's impossible to know.
