It is a good thing to hear. I always expected that apple would be ahead of the other compneys in the Green side of things sence they are so far ahead in other ways.
If you read turds the end of the ardicle he said that iPods are recycled. When you recycle one you will get 10% off of a new iPod.i think this is great. I wonder if using led's means less power consumption too?
now...if they could only do something about the piles and piles of ipods - i wonder if they are recycled or not???
OLED is the only technology that I am aware of that fits the description of what he is talking about. More info below:An interesting read, but one correction to the original post, he doesn't say OLED displays are coming, but rather LED backlighting for their displays. There's a big difference if I remember correctly.
:lmao: Well put!Won't be long before someone says this isn't good enough. Some people likely won't be happy until Macs & iPods are made of pressed hay and mucilage.
"The iMucilage"... :heybaby:Won't be long before someone says this isn't good enough. Some people likely won't be happy until Macs & iPods are made of pressed hay and mucilage.
The funny thing is, one of the advantages of OLED's is that they are supposed to be "printed" onto suitable substrate surfaces, significantly reducing the manufacturing cost. Hmmm, cheaper to manufacture, yet higher in price . . . can you say money grab by a dying company?He's clearly referring to LCDs that use LED and not fluorescent tubes for backlighting. This is in contrast to the superior but grossly expensive new OLED technology that Sony is bringing out -- any guesses how much the 26" model will cost? I'm guessing $4000, at least 4x the cost of high end 26" LCDs. Like all technologies, it will come down in price but for the time being, no.
When LCD's first came out,t hey were very expensive as well...as time went on and manufacturing volume went up, pricing went down. Same will happen here.The funny thing is, one of the advantages of OLED's is that they are supposed to be "printed" onto suitable substrate surfaces, significantly reducing the manufacturing cost. Hmmm, cheaper to manufacture, yet higher in price . . . can you say money grab by a dying company?![]()
greenpeace.org said:Want to give us some green to celebrate a greener apple?