ehMac banner

1 - 20 of 2224 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
23,273 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)
With some reservations (because some idiot will try to open this thing with a blue wrench or try to turn it into a bomb...) this is fairly attractive.

Local Mini Nuclear Reactors to Power US Homes within 5 Years

Powered by low-enriched uranium fuel, each Hyperion Power Module will produce enough clean, safe and environmentally friendly energy to reliably power 20,000 standard American homes for 10cents per kilowatt/hr. Linked together they have the capacity to power much larger enterprises.
Link to Hyperion.

edit: Link to Hyperion added
 

·
Resident Curmudgeon
Joined
·
86,945 Posts
Too bad the anti-nuclear crowd will likely be the biggest hurdle this technology has to hurdle. Those dopes want clean air but refuse to embrace the clean production of energy. Go figure.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,570 Posts
Hey, I'm all for it. This is exactly the kind of technology we need!

They can put one outside my door.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
17,728 Posts
I remember back in the 60s my Physics prof saying that waste was the biggest issue with nuclear power and that was something the techs should be able to solve in a very few years. We are still waiting. Carbon dioxide is not the only thing that makes a power source dirty. This is still enriched uranium and waste will still be a major issue. Trading relatively harmless CO2 for poison is not a real solution.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,570 Posts
Did you bother to read the story?

"To add to their eco credentials, each module will produce a mere softball-sized amount of recyclable waste every five years and will release nothing in the way of greenhouse gas emissions, unlike 'traditional' fossil fuels."
 

·
Resident Curmudgeon
Joined
·
86,945 Posts
Underground storage of nuclear waste is the solution. For example, there are millions of dry oil wells in the world to put waste far out of reach of doing harm to any human.

People who oppose nuclear energy seldom think it through.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,415 Posts
There are also good technologies for firing projectiles loaded with nuclear waste into space (e.g. rail guns and light gas guns).

While the attitude of "we'll just throw this stuff away" is what got us in trouble ecologically in the first place, you really can't pollute space, and if you pick a trajectory intelligently, you can be sure the stuff you get rid of this way will never come back.

But all that would be moot if we could get decent fusion reactors working. Properly controlled fusion generates helium as a waste product (or any other element you want... but for anything heavier than iron you have to put energy into the system).

With controlled fusion, our only remaining problem (apart from overpopulation, which is fundamentally the root cause of almost all problems) would be heat pollution.

Cheers
 

·
Resident Curmudgeon
Joined
·
86,945 Posts
Good points bryanc.

Seems to me that nuclear is the way of the future with many options that allow mankind a cleaner environment.

I just don't understand why people oppose any form of nuclear power.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,570 Posts
SINC, the problem is most people don't have a clue what our current energy needs entail, never mind the future. If we're going to wean ourselves off fossil fuels then ALL forms of alternate energy must be on the table.

We in Canada don't live in a stable climate zone. Things like wind and solar cannot be relied upon to meet our needs in total. They are certainly part of the package but not the whole story.

This isn't simply about CO2 emissions, it's about being self reliant and not beholden to the whims of OPEC and oil speculators.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,427 Posts
With some reservations (because some idiot will try to open this thing with a blue wrench or try to turn it into a bomb...) this is fairly attractive.

Local Mini Nuclear Reactors to Power US Homes within 5 Years



Link to Hyperion.

edit: Link to Hyperion added
The advantage is that the fuel is in the form of Uranium Carbide - which even if stolen, would be very, very hard to "grind up" in order to enrich it enough for even a dirty bomb. It is one of the most difficult materials known to machine, even with the best diamond based cutters; and has a very high melting temperature, which would make it very difficult to melt down into some kind of machinable form.

Of course, the problem facing Uranium Carbide fuels is the very problem of disposal or reprocessing, which would tax current state of the art technologies; but disposal is the problem that all state of the art reactor designs are facing.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
42,278 Posts
There are also good technologies for firing projectiles loaded with nuclear waste into space (e.g. rail guns and light gas guns).
Yeah right! And blow the whole flippin' moon out of orbit?
 

Attachments

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,590 Posts
Hey, there's one from out of the memory banks! Love that retro-futuro font. Very 70s... in a good way! Loved them insectile Eagle landers they had. Gotta get me one of those some day.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,695 Posts
A big problem is terrorism. They would most likely have some fairly intense air protection around those bad boys.

Many speculate the reason that one of the 9/11 flights went down in Pennsylvania was because it shot down since the army thought it was heading towards the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant. That would have taken out the entire eastern seaboard including southern ontario and the clouds would have taken out of the rest of us in due time...
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
42,278 Posts
A big problem is terrorism. They would most likely have some fairly intense air protection around those bad boys.

Many speculate the reason that one of the 9/11 flights went down in Pennsylvania was because it shot down since the army thought it was heading towards the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant. That would have taken out the entire eastern seaboard including southern ontario and the clouds would have taken out of the rest of us in due time...
Smacking a plane into a reactor building wouldn't cause a nuclear explosion.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
42,278 Posts
I would like to see utiities offering geothermal systems on a predictable interest loan over the long term, and paying them back on the utiity bill.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,491 Posts
I would like to see utiities offering geothermal systems on a predictable interest loan over the long term, and paying them back on the utiity bill.
Let's all stick an A-coil in the sewer system in front of our houses.

Never freezes down there. :)

 
1 - 20 of 2224 Posts
Top