Sea Ice Update - ehMac.ca
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Advertise


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Aug 18th, 2009, 01:05 PM   #1
Honourable Citizen
 
screature's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aylmer (Gatineau) across the river from Ottawa
Posts: 20,720
Sea Ice Update

Here is something that is very interesting and good news (unless you make your living by predicting the sky is falling).

Sea ice update: Well above 2007 record minimum

Quote:
Arctic sea ice, used by many climatologists (and others) as a barometer of climate change, is once again running below the 1979-2000 average this summer. However, it remains well above the record minimum summer melt seen in 2007. In 2007, the ice coverage was approx. 5.2 million square km; this year for the same date (August 17) it is approx. 6.1 million sq. km.

Thus, it is about 22% below the 1979-2000 average whereas the 2007 reading was 32% below the norm; this represents an area about the size of Alaska in difference...
screature is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old Aug 18th, 2009, 02:02 PM   #2
Assured Advertiser
Honourable Citizen
 
MacDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Planet Earth.....on FASTER boil :-(
Posts: 30,834
Meaningless in any context you care to mention, when the ice shelves and multi-year ice return let us know.....a skim of 1st year ice after a double La Nina...denidiot fodder...nothing more..

The glaciers tell the tale....net mass loss accelerating.....

Pine Island Glacier is in the Amundsen Sea, part of the Southern Ocean bordering ... would raise global sea level by five meters (16 feet). ...

Quote:
Antarctic Glacier Thinning At Alarming Rate

ScienceDaily (Aug. 15, 2009) — The thinning of a gigantic glacier in Antarctica is accelerating, scientists report. The Pine Island Glacier in West Antarctica, which is around twice the size of Scotland, is losing ice four times as fast as it was a decade years ago.

The research, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, also reveals that ice thinning is now occurring much further inland. At this rate scientists estimate that the main section of the glacier will have disappeared in just 100 years, six times sooner than was previously thought.

The Pine Island Glacier is located within the most inaccessible area of Antarctica – over 1000 km from the nearest research base – and was for many years overlooked. Now, scientists have been able to track the glacier's development using continuous satellite measurements over the past 15 years.

"Accelerated thinning of the Pine Island Glacier represents perhaps the greatest imbalance in the cryosphere today, and yet we would not have known about it if it weren't for a succession of satellite instruments," says Professor Andrew Shepherd, a co-author of the research from the School of Earth and Environment at the University of Leeds.

"Being able to assemble a continuous record of measurements over the past 15 years has provided us with the remarkable ability to identify both subtle and dramatic changes in ice that were previously hidden," he adds.

Scientists believe that the retreat of glaciers in this sector of Antarctica is caused by warming of the surrounding oceans, though it is too early to link such a trend to global warming.

The 5,400 km squared region of the Pine Island Glacier affected today is big enough to impact the rate at which sea level rise around the world.

"Because the Pine Island Glacier contains enough ice to almost double the IPCC's best estimate of 21st century sea level rise, the manner in which the glacier will respond to the accelerated thinning is a matter of great concern," says Professor Shepherd.

The research was led by Professor Duncan Wingham at University College London, and was funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council.
Antarctic Glacier Thinning At Alarming Rate



__________________
In Australia and the web site is out of date.
Lots of good deals on Retinas, previous high end MacPros and current MacPro 6 core bundles in stock. [email protected]
MacDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18th, 2009, 02:07 PM   #3
Honourable Citizen
 
screature's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aylmer (Gatineau) across the river from Ottawa
Posts: 20,720
^^^ Now why would I have expected anything less...

Quote:
Scientists believe that the retreat of glaciers in this sector of Antarctica is caused by warming of the surrounding oceans, though it is too early to link such a trend to global warming.
screature is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18th, 2009, 02:28 PM   #4
Honourable Citizen
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,115
Scientists believe that the retreat of glaciers in this sector of Antarctica is caused by warming of the surrounding oceans, though it is too early to link such a trend to global warming.

I think that line is worth repeating (again) for those in the peanut gallery.
MannyP Design is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18th, 2009, 02:55 PM   #5
Assured Advertiser
Honourable Citizen
 
MacDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Planet Earth.....on FASTER boil :-(
Posts: 30,834
Sure - it's the hot air from the denidiots.....what the hell do you think is causing net glacial mass loss worldwide....

Lets put the the Arctic in context

Quote:
Conditions in context

The average pace of ice loss during July 2009 was nearly identical to that of July 2007. Ice loss sped up during the third week of July, and slowed again during the last few days of the month.

Averaged for the month, July 2009 saw a decline rate in ice extent of 106,000 square kilometers (41,000 square miles) per day. For comparison, the rate of decline for July 2007 was 107,000 square kilometers (41,000 square miles) per day and the July 2008 rate of decline was 94,000 square kilometers (36,000 square miles) per day. The Arctic Ocean lost a total of 3.19 million square kilometers (1.23 million square miles) of ice during July 2009, and dropped below ice extent at this time in 2008.
average monthly data from 1979-2009 for July Figure 3. Monthly July ice extent for 1979 to 2009 shows a decline of 6.1% per decade.
—Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center

July 2009 compared to past years

Ice extent averaged for July 2009 was the third lowest in the satellite record for the month of July. The long-term trend indicates a decline of 6.1% per decade in July ice extent since 1979, relative to the 1979 to 2000 average, an average of 62,000 square kilometers (24,000 square miles) of ice per year.
Net Mass loss is what counts..



.and loss of ice shelves.....the Arctic has just about zero left now

Quote:
Massive Canadian Arctic ice shelf breaks away

14:57 03 September 2008 by New Scientist staff and Reuters
For similar stories, visit the Climate Change Topic Guide
A huge 55-square-kilometre ice shelf in Canada's northern Arctic broke away last month and the remaining shelves have shrunk at a "massive and disturbing" rate. These are the latest signs of accelerating climate change in the remote region, scientists said on Tuesday.

They said the Markham Ice Shelf, one of just five remaining ice shelves in the Canadian Arctic, split away from Ellesmere Island in early August. They also said two large chunks totalling 120 square km had broken off the nearby Serson Ice Shelf, reducing it in size by 60%.

"The changes ... were massive and disturbing," says Warwick Vincent, director of the Centre for Northern Studies at Laval University in Quebec.

Temperatures in large parts of the Arctic have risen far faster than the global average in recent decades, a development that experts say is linked to global warming.

"These substantial calving events underscore the rapidity of changes taking place in the Arctic," says Derek Mueller, an Arctic ice shelf specialist at Trent University in Ontario.

End of an era

"These changes are irreversible under the present climate and indicate that the environmental conditions that have kept these ice shelves in balance for thousands of years are no longer present," he said.

Mueller said the total amount of ice lost from the shelves along Ellesmere Island this summer totalled 215 square km - more than three times the area of New York's Manhattan island.

The figure is more than 10 times the amount of ice shelf cover that scientists estimated on 30 July would vanish from around the island this summer.

Reduced sea ice conditions and unusually high air temperatures have facilitated the ice shelf losses," says Luke Copland of the University of Ottawa.

"Extensive new cracks across remaining parts of the largest remaining ice shelf, the Ward Hunt, mean that it will continue to disintegrate in the coming years," he said.

Destructive summer

The first sign of serious recent erosion in the five shelves came in late July, when sheets of ice totalling almost 21 square km broke off the Ward Hunt shelf. Since then the shelf has lost another 22 square km.

Ellesmere Island was once home to a single enormous ice shelf of around 9000 square km. All that is left of that shelf today are the four much smaller shelves that together cover only about 800 square km.
Massive Canadian Arctic ice shelf breaks away - environment - 03 September 2008 - New Scientist

Why don't you inform yourself of the reality of what is occurring instead of promoting a failed meme that climate change induced by our activities isn't happening

Global Glacier Changes: facts and figures

You can choose to keep your head buried in denial but the changes are coming both to the climate and to the policies surrounding moving towards carbon neutral...they WILL affect you.

Carbon trading/taxes are coming

Nations are taking action - even China
China working on further national plan to address climate changefficial_English_Xinhua

- tho Harper remains the Dino-of-the-Day in the environmental eyes.

The rest of the planet is getting on with it....

COPENHAGEN Climate Conference 2009

You can be informed or play the gibbering fool.....your choice.



__________________
In Australia and the web site is out of date.
Lots of good deals on Retinas, previous high end MacPros and current MacPro 6 core bundles in stock. [email protected]
MacDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18th, 2009, 03:09 PM   #6
Honourable Citizen
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,115
MacDoc, you are a true Rockstar! Keep swinging for the fences, dude.
MannyP Design is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18th, 2009, 04:20 PM   #7
Resident Curmudgeon
 
SINC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 84,925
Send a message via AIM to SINC
The original post is just one more example of wrong science. How much more of it is wrong becomes the question?
__________________
Visit my website:
St. Albert's Place On The Web
(Over 3.1 million folks have.)
SINC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18th, 2009, 05:05 PM   #8
Honourable Citizen
 
screature's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aylmer (Gatineau) across the river from Ottawa
Posts: 20,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by SINC View Post
The original post is just one more example of wrong science. How much more of it is wrong becomes the question?
How so? An honest question, not meant to be provocative.
screature is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18th, 2009, 05:37 PM   #9
Resident Curmudgeon
 
SINC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Central Alberta
Posts: 84,925
Send a message via AIM to SINC
Quote:
Originally Posted by screature View Post
How so? An honest question, not meant to be provocative.
I did not take it that way. I simply mean that Ma Nature continues to defy science every time they think they have it figured out, so logically the next question becomes, how much of the science on global warming is flawed? Simple as that. Either that or you accept that science is always correct. I don't subscribe to that theory at all.
__________________
Visit my website:
St. Albert's Place On The Web
(Over 3.1 million folks have.)
SINC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18th, 2009, 06:30 PM   #10
Honourable Citizen
 
screature's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aylmer (Gatineau) across the river from Ottawa
Posts: 20,720
^^^ Ahh, I see...
screature is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My Macbook Pro got shippet out yesterday from china and it stuck at DEPARTURE SCAN daniels Anything Mac 22 Jul 31st, 2009 09:16 PM
Now In Your Software Update.... 8127972 Anything Mac 5 Feb 22nd, 2008 08:24 AM
Latest Mac OS X Security Update breaks 64-bit application interact Anything Mac 19 Jan 30th, 2008 11:26 PM
New Updates Available. macguy.nielsen Anything Mac 6 Mar 2nd, 2006 03:58 PM
Apple has posted PowerBook G4 Graphics Update 1.0 for 1.67GHz PowerBook G4s. Ottawaman Anything Mac 0 Aug 11th, 2005 08:49 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © 1999 - 2012, ehMac.ca All rights reserved. ehMac is not affiliated with Apple Inc. Mac, iPod, iTunes, iPhone, Apple TV are trademarks of Apple Inc. Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2

Tribe.ca: Urban living in Toronto!