How Wired sees us - ehMac.ca
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Advertise


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Dec 3rd, 2002, 02:17 PM   #1
Full Citizen
 
Britnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 719
Send a message via AIM to Britnell
Post

Mac Loyalists: Don't Tread on Us
http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,56575,00.html

By Leander Kahney

There are 25 million people around the world who use Macintosh computers, according to Apple. But unlike ordinary personal computers, people don't simply use Macs, they become fans. They develop a passion for the machines, which can sometimes turn into an obsession.

"Apple is like a strange drug that you just can't quite get enough of," the musician Barry Adamson told the Guardian newspaper. "They shouldn't call it Mac. They should call it crack!"

Mac loyalty is so well-known, it's a cliché. Mac users are routinely referred to as Apple's faithful, Mac zealots, members of the cult of Mac, Appleholics, Macheads, Maccies, Macolytes and Mac addicts. The biannual Macworld conference is often compared to a religious revival meeting, where Steve Jobs is worshipped like a rock star, or a charismatic cult leader.

The Mac community is arguably the largest subculture in computing. Mac enthusiasts -- as a group -- are probably more loyal, more dedicated than users of any other computer, perhaps even Linux. Linux and Unix users are, in fact, switching to Macs in droves.

What other computer inspires fans to get tattoos, personalized license plates, amass huge collections of ancient machines, build Mac aquariums, or proudly describe themselves as Mac fans, Mac freaks, Mac nuts? The Amiga, perhaps, but certainly not Dell, Compaq or Microsoft.

What makes Mac users so loyal?

The answer, of course, depends on who is asked: Marketers say it's the brand, psychologists say it's a social relationship, and Apple loyalists say it's the merits of the machine, its friendliness, its simplicity.

But some common themes emerge: community, the alternative to Microsoft, and the brand, which connotes nonconformity, liberty and creativity.

Mac users are not merely an ad hoc group of people who happen to use the same kind of computer. They represent a distinct subculture, with its own rituals, traditions and mindset.

"If you see somebody in an airport in London, or someplace down in Peru or something, and you see an Apple tag on their bag, or an Apple T-shirt, it's like the Deadheads … you have an instant friend," Chris Espinosa, one of Apple's earliest employees, told Stanford Library. "Most likely, you share something very core to your being with this person, which is a life outlook, a special vision."

One of the defining characteristics of the Mac community is its loyalty to Apple. Through thick and thin, Apple's customers stick by the company. This summer, Apple upset the Mac community by suddenly announcing a $100 annual subscription fee for its .Mac online services, which were formerly free. On top of this, an upgrade to OS X -- the kind of upgrade users usually don't pay for -- would cost $130.

The new pricing policies prompted howls of protest. Websites, online forums and news stories were full of acrimonious kvetching about "gouging" and "bait-and-switch." Long-time users launched petitions, fired off angry letters and for the first time in years, there were lots of threats to leave the Mac platform altogether.

But despite the howling, there's been no mass exodus to Windows. The opposite, in fact, seems to be true. Anecdotal evidence points to more and more people switching to the Mac.

Could other companies get away with this? Probably not. Yahoo and Hotmail, which provide free online e-mail, have started charging for extra services, but supply basic service for nothing. Likewise, Microsoft's latest update for Windows XP is free.

Andrew Lackey, a visiting professor of business and economics journalism at Boston University, said Apple's monopoly in the Mac business allows it to get away with things companies in a competitive market can't.

"With Apple you're a captive, and to some extent they abuse that privilege," Lackey said. "I would have thought Apple would be all folksy, like a Ben & Jerry's kind of company. But in my experience, PC companies are much more responsive."

The loyalty to Apple has led some to describe the Mac community as masochistic, the "punish me harder" brigade in the words of the Register.

"They eat it up," said Matthew Rothenberg, an editor at Ziff Davis and a longtime Apple watcher. "It's like a B&D (bondage and dominance) relationship. There needs to a psychosexual analysis of the Mac community."

Customer loyalty was the only thing that saved Apple during the late 1990s, when the company was in danger of going out of business, according to Gil Amelio, the CEO in charge at the time.

"It's the cult," Amelio told Computerworld. "It's what's kept the damn thing afloat through some of the most incredibly bad business decisions I've ever seen anywhere."

During this time, psychologist Ross Goldstein was commissioned by a rival computer manufacturer to figure out how to appeal to marooned Apple customers if the company went under.

Goldstein, a clinical psychologist with the B/R/S Group, a market research firm, recruited a number of Apple users for a focus group. To qualify, they had to agree they would consider migrating to Windows if Apple went out of business. But as soon as the session started, they all reversed themselves and said they'd never consider switching.

"They were steadfast in their resistance to moving over," Goldstein said. "It was humorous. They were picked because they might switch, but they all said, 'I'll be an Apple user until my dying keystrokes.' The degree of loyalty to the platform, and everything it represented, was so profound. It was fascinating."

Goldstein said participants' left brain, the logical side, was telling them they might have to switch if Apple went under. But the right brain, the emotional attachment to Apple, rejected it. There was a profound sense that Apple was one of them -- counterculture, grassroots, human, approachable, Goldstein said.

"Apple really appeals to the humanistic side of people," Goldstein said. "The image of the brand, the heritage, the experience. It really spoke to who they were."

By contrast, Microsoft was the dark enemy. "It was almost as though they were prisoners of war," Goldstein said. "Microsoft had taken over the computer world and they might have to go over, but they would not do so willingly."

As Goldstein discovered, for a lot of Mac fans, one of the major appeals of Apple is that it's not Microsoft.

To Mac users, Apple represents everything that Microsoft isn't. Apple innovates; Microsoft copies. Apple puts out solid products; Microsoft puts out buggy ones. Apple represents creativity and individuality; Microsoft represents business and conformity. Apple is the scrappy underdog; Microsoft the big, predatory monopoly.

Such is Mac users' derision, Microsoft is commonly referred to as Micro$oft, Microshaft or Microshit. Bill Gates, of course, is the antichrist. There's the common perception that Gates is in business for every penny he can get, while Apple exists to create great technology -- to change the world, in Steve Jobs' words. For Apple, turning a profit is secondary.

"There's a lot of ill will towards Microsoft for a lot of reasons," said Steve Manning, co-founder of

A Hundred Monkeys, a brand consultancy in Sausalito, California.

"Microsoft crams a bad system down peoples' throats. It's the evil empire, big brother, a monolithic corporation. Apple has done a lot of things right in the way they position themselves and the way they speak to the world." Manning said that while he's obliged to use a Windows machine at work, he went out and bought several Macs for his home.

Like a lot of Mac fans, he enjoys the feeling that he's in control of his computer, rather than Microsoft.

"At home, its nice to use a machine that the corporation can't force you to use," he said. "It's mine. It's personal. This is mine and you can't taint it."
__________________
Necessity is the excuse for every infringement of human freedom.<br />It is the argument of the tyrant and the creed of the slave.<br /> -- William Pitt, 1763
Britnell is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old Dec 3rd, 2002, 02:56 PM   #2
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,774
Talking

Yeah...I would say that the term "distinctive subculture" just about describes most of us. I guess ehMac is a subculture of a subculture.

And ehMax is the benevolent dictator of this vehemently dedicated splinter group.

Hey...it works for me!
MacNutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3rd, 2002, 03:34 PM   #3
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 283
Thumbs up

I agree there is a supreme cult like thing happening here but when I read this ("The answer, of course, depends on who is asked: Marketers say it's the brand, psychologists say it's a social relationship, and Apple loyalists say it's the merits of the machine, its friendliness, its simplicity.") I think it was summed up nicely. To me it truly is the merit of the machine. I don't know about the social relationship part though, when I first got my mac (2 years ago) I couldn't find many people who were all that helpful. Mac owners I have tended to find were not all that willing to share their knowledge or anything else for that matter. ehMac is the first real place I have found where sharing is common place. I have only chattet up a few of you but you get the jist I am sure.
timmer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old Dec 3rd, 2002, 04:05 PM   #4
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 433
Post

i just like using a computer that works. [img]smile.gif[/img]

and the whole thing about if you see someone with an apple tag (or if their power/ibook is out), you have an instant friend is true. in my neighborhood, up at a coffeeshop, the laptop clientel is almost exclusivley mac, and i've had many a conversation about jag/speed/programs etc.

emceepj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3rd, 2002, 04:08 PM   #5
Honourable Citizen
 
james_squared's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cranbrook, British Columbia
Posts: 1,068
Post

Hello,

For me, I switched because I wanted to try something new and I wanted a machine that 'just worked.' I've had a few problems with my iBook, but that's normal with just about anything. I don't know if I'm a member of a 'distinctive subculture' or not, but I do enjoy this machine very much. It works great and the relatively limted software that is avialable also works well. (Wow, wasn't I being generous with the phrase 'relatively limited.')

For me, I just got sick and tired of the OS crashing, programs crashing, and that damn registry. I just don't want to bother with any of that **** anymore. I just want to turn the machine on, and have it work throughout the day until I let her go to sleep at night. Is that really so much to ask for? Well, it was with my PC and it is with my wife's PC.

Of course, she'll be getting an iMac soon enough. Then, she, too, will be a 'convert.'

The words 'convert' and 'switcher' imply that I've left the flock to venture out on my own. I am a 'heathen.' I am someone who can think for myself and will not be forced to use a computer that just plain licks ass.

I really hope that my non-conformist free thinking attitude does not make me part of a distinctive subculture. I hope that a large majority of the people have those qualities. But I may be wrong.

James

Dictionary: heathen - 1 a. One who adheres to the religion of a people or nation that does not acknowledge the God of Judaism, Christianity, or Islam. b. Such persons considered as a group; the unconverted. 2 a. One who is regarded as irreligious, uncivilized, or unenlightened. b. Such persons considered as a group.

I guess if I replace "Judaism, Christianity, or Islam" with Windows, then I guess I am a heathen. Cool! I''ll be burning in hell.
james_squared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3rd, 2002, 04:38 PM   #6
Full Citizen
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: GTA
Posts: 124
Talking

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by james_squared:
For me, I just got sick and tired of the OS crashing, programs crashing, and that damn registry. I just don't want to bother with any of that **** anymore. I just want to turn the machine on, and have it work throughout the day until I let her go to sleep at night. Is that really so much to ask for?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

A definate switch ad. When you recite this into the camera, you gotta really put emphasis on the I just don't want to bother with any of that **** anymore [img]smile.gif[/img]
thirdeyevision is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3rd, 2002, 05:13 PM   #7
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 363
Post

i didn't like the article's emphasis on anti-microsoft feelings. i'm a lot more pro-mac than anti-microsoft.
sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3rd, 2002, 06:51 PM   #8
Honourable Citizen
 
Chealion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,069
Send a message via ICQ to Chealion Send a message via AIM to Chealion Send a message via MSN to Chealion
Post

My name is not Joe, but Mike and I am a Canadian Mac User!

Now we leave the rest of the rant up for Dr. G to finish with his great coffee induced ramblings...
eg.
A Mouse should be one buttoned (Debatable)
And the Jaguar is a truly noble animal
(Personally I prefer the Platypus, see my topic on Hexley)
__________________
I still remember Macnutt.
Chealion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4th, 2002, 05:06 AM   #9
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,774
Thumbs up

A bit of a generalisation PosterBoy...but well put!

Too bad you've been damned...I'd like to continue this, but my religion prevents it.
[img]tongue.gif[/img]
MacNutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 4th, 2002, 11:57 AM   #10
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,812
Post

I'm with Posterboy here. One of the few things that I never liked MS for - is what they did to Netscape. In my antiquated days of Windoze, I was a Netscape user and never liked Explorer. Then the hostile takeover/beatdown started, and Netscape just went down the tubes... I felt so horrible, and I had nothing to do with it. I used to read about many within S.Valley who felt the same way. But the bottom line is that MS still make decent software for Macs(I have no probs with Office), although I use both NC and Explorer. Hell, I'm about to get my hands on Entourage soon...
Ohenri is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Advice on Wired Router IronMac Anything Mac 11 Nov 23rd, 2005 09:11 PM
Faster than wired, wireless network technology MACSPECTRUM Everything Else, eh! 11 Sep 20th, 2005 10:56 AM
Question: Airport Express and wired network Zoiks Mac, iPhone, iPad and iPod Help & Troubleshooting 6 Sep 6th, 2005 12:42 AM
Wireless Access on a Wired Network trump Mac, iPhone, iPad and iPod Help & Troubleshooting 6 Dec 26th, 2004 09:17 PM
"Microsoft Sees Worm In Apple" Sandy McMurray Anything Mac 17 Jun 19th, 2003 07:03 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999 - 2012, ehMac.ca All rights reserved. ehMac is not affiliated with Apple Inc. Mac, iPod, iTunes, iPhone, Apple TV are trademarks of Apple Inc. Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2

Tribe.ca: Urban living in Toronto!