How do you see pricing for G5's in the next 6 months? - ehMac.ca
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Advertise


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Oct 9th, 2003, 01:26 PM   #1
New Neighbour
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 24
Post

I'm caught between wanting a Dual G5 but only being able to afford a G5 1.8.
Now that Panther is coming out, my only dilemma is dual processors.
The 750.00 difference is more than I can spend for the Dual, does anyone think the next revision will have a dual for around 3500?
Otherwise, I think I'll have to accept that a dual isn't in the cards for me.
thanks
angrymonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old Oct 9th, 2003, 01:31 PM   #2
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 454
Post

Im thinking we will see a speed bump along with some new stuff at Macworld in January.

Hopefully once they bump the speed we will see some openbox dual 2ghz going for something closer to 3500.

=)
insertclevername is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9th, 2003, 02:45 PM   #3
Full Citizen
 
Timothy J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto'City Core'
Posts: 273
Post

I have a sneaky feeling that the next round of G5's in January will see all 3 models equipped with DAUL G5's. Why? You ask. I think that there are always problems getting quantities of more powerful processors whenever the computer line up being offered is new. Apple has dealt with this in the past by simply offering DUAL processor machines to placate consumers so that we feel that it's a good deal. I just bought my single 1.6 GHz G5 at the end of September. If Apple makes all machines DUAL in January and the entry level machine is the same price ($2700.00 CAN) as what I just payed, then consumers are going to buy a lot of machines thinking, wow, what a great deal, two processors for the price of what one was 5 months ago. This would be my reaction as well and I might consider trading up at that time if it does happen that way. I personally would rather see larger MHz gains than DUAL G5's. I say this because in the past Apple has offered DUAL G4's in many machines with smaller gains in MHz. About 80% of the applications I run on my powermac's are single processor savvy only and I want MORE POWER! The motherboard in my single G5 1.6 GHz MAC has all the connections there for the second processor, but it's sadly vacant. So I know how easy it would be for Apple to simply decide to go dual all across the board for the new models in January, and make MHz increases very minor like only 200 MHz or less. Apple also makes more money from the professional users who have to keep trading up when they require more power. Final Cut Pro's real time effects for example. You need a minimum DUAL G4 MDD to be able to barely use this feature for 2 video layers simultaneously. You really need the DUAL G4 1.42 to use this feature with ease and power. I know, I've tested all the MDD models with real time effects feature. What it comes down to is availabilty of the IBM G5 chips. If IBM hasn't made vast improvements in the MHz than Apple deals with it by offering pretty much the same chips from September 2003 models and putting two in every new MAC. Keeping us happy. And it does make me happy for applications that UTILIZE dual processors but my audio apps are crying out for more SPEEEED!!

Here is the recent history of the powermac line up. You be the judge.

January 2001
G4 466
DUAL 533 G4's
G4 667
G4 733

July 2001
G4 733
G4 867
DUAL 800 G4's

January 2002
G4 800
G4 933
DUAL 1 Ghz

August 2002
DUAL 867 G4's
DUAL 1.0 Ghz G4's
DUAL 1.25 Ghz G4's

January 2003
G4 1.0 Ghz
DUAL 1.25 Ghz G4's
DUAL 1.42 Ghz G4's

August 2003
Single G5 1.6 Ghz
Single G5 1.8 Ghz
DUAL G5 2.0 Ghz

My prediction for January 2004 [I feel like Karnak, the envelope please!]
DUAL G5 1.8 Ghz
DUAL G5 2.0 Ghz
DUAL G5 2.25 Ghz

In answer to the question posed. Will there be a DUAL G5 2.0 GHz powermac for 3500.00 soon. I believe the answer is YES! And they will be $2700.00. But you will have wait until January 2004 to get them new. But if you need one today you will have to look on ebay and pray for a good deal because the duty and shipping from outside of Canada will kill you on anything you buy outside of our boarders.

I know this post is going to make for a lot of debate amongst ehmac members. Come on guys what do you think of my hypothosis?
--------------------------------------------------
"Welcome to the real world." - Morpheus in The Matrix [img]graemlins/heybaby.gif[/img]

[ October 09, 2003, 02:29 PM: Message edited by: Timothy J ]
__________________
24"iMac 2.8gHz/17"powerbook 1.67gHz/iMac G4 800 mHz 15" LCD/1.0gHz Titanium G4/Pismo 500mHz powerbook/powerbook 1400 (still use every day)/20 GIG iPod/Video iPod
Timothy J is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old Oct 9th, 2003, 04:54 PM   #4
New Neighbour
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 24
Post

I like your long, thought out reply!

What I'm wondering, looking at the recent history- why did it take from jan 2001 - Aug 2002 to see duals for every G4? (I imagine since duals were new and OsX is very dual aware, that a similar waiting period will not re-occur.)

I looked at the photoshop MP aware test on bare feats and the results are enough to make me pause in ordering a 1.8, since any MP computer easily beats it.
So I guess I'm wondering how much faster will some applications and OSX go using MP?
And is there going to be a large increase of MP aware functions in programs, or are they utilizing MPs as much now as they will in the next few years?
Is there a tarot card reader in the house?
angrymonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9th, 2003, 05:26 PM   #5
Honourable Citizen
 
gordguide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 5,247
Post

I think Apple expanded the dual line, reluctantly, when it became obvious that Motorla wouldn't be able to scale the G4 speed fast enough. I could be wrong, but I don't see single CPU G5's disappearing from the lineup in the near future. I would agree, however, that dual-CPU Macs are here to stay.

My totally uneducated guess is that we will see Apple getting the introductory pricing down to below $2500 and some decent CPU speed improvements in early February. Perhaps keeping the ear to the ground with IBM and the chip's fab yields could shed some insight (haven't heard much lately, but that could be a concession to Apple). However, that might be when we see other models upgraded instead; it's hard to say.

We might (or might not) see the entry-level machine move to the better MB at the next revision; if they can change that and remain at ~US$ 1500, they will.

Considering the prognisis for the US dollar (not good), we might even see near $2K Canadian for the base model; price points are determined based on the US market, and Apple wants that unit to be near or below $US 1500.00.
gordguide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9th, 2003, 08:14 PM   #6
Full Citizen
 
Timothy J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto'City Core'
Posts: 273
Post

One thing that is starting to get very over used (and misleading) out there in the land of testing is the PHOTOSHOP is this fast on these machines test. I know how the bar graphs at the Bare Feats web site look. If I didn't know anything about computers I would assume top-o-the line DUAL machines with the shortest times to do the tasks were the best MAC's to buy. BUT! and I say this BUT! Besides Final Cut Pro and the Adobe family of applications and maybe now Logic Audio because Apple recently it took over. I don't know of any other applications that are specifically written to take advantage of the 2nd processor. When I run my audio apps like REASON, REAKTOR or CUBASE on DUAL G4 machines it only uses 50% of each processor. So that's like having only one processor anyway. So I go back to my original plea...MORE horsepower please! I want G5 chips running at blasing fast speeds so I can push my music to the limit. I'm tired of all my friends WINTEL boxes being twice as powerful as any G4 MAC I've ever owned. The 1.6 G5 is a great improvement but the PENTIUM 4's at 3 Ghz still kick the powermac's ass, for all the audio applications. Not everyone sits at home using ONLY photoshop all day long. And when are MAC users EVER going to have a fraction, just a fraction of the choices for graphics cards like PC users. Some of the reason the top-o-the line DUAL G4's score so well in QUAKE and UNREAL games is because they have the best graphics card you can get from Apple. IE the ATI 9600 or 9800. I would like to be able to order a better graphics (higher RAM & more pixels per cycle) card that isn't 3 times more expensive than the same model card for a PC. I'm not the biggest gamer in the world but I do know that a great graphics card will help speed your computer along nomatter what it's doing. DUAL processors are not for everyone. If the programers who write for MAC applications were to all start writing all the code with two processors in mind, then my point here is moot. [img]tongue.gif[/img]
--------------------------------------------------
"Life moves pretty fast, if you don't stop and look around once in a while it'll pass you by." - Ferris Bueller
__________________
24"iMac 2.8gHz/17"powerbook 1.67gHz/iMac G4 800 mHz 15" LCD/1.0gHz Titanium G4/Pismo 500mHz powerbook/powerbook 1400 (still use every day)/20 GIG iPod/Video iPod
Timothy J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9th, 2003, 08:18 PM   #7
Mac Guru
 
monokitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,627
Post

Quote:
And when are MAC users EVER going to have a fraction, just a fraction of the choices for graphics cards like PC users. Some of the reason the top-o-the line DUAL G4's score so well in QUAKE and UNREAL games is because they have the best graphics card you can get from Apple. IE the ATI 9600 or 9800. I would like to be able to order a better graphics (higher RAM & more pixels per cycle) card that isn't 3 times more expensive than the same model card for a PC.
I don't think that's even worth complaing over. Yes, the PC has far, far more graphics cards than the Mac has, but 3/4 of their options are cheap, crap or completely no-name brand video cards - so who cares? They have more options, but they also have far more junk options as well. Apple only has some of the best graphics cards in their Macs.
__________________
ACMT
MacBook Pro (15-inch, Mid 2012) 2.3 GHz Core i7, 16GB, 256GB M4 SSD
iPhone 8 - 64GB S/G Sound System Audio Engine A2 Display UltraSharp U2412M 24"
Custom Built Gaming PC Kaby Lake Edition | 16GB DDR4 | GTX 1070 8G
monokitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9th, 2003, 08:19 PM   #8
Assured Advertiser
Honourable Citizen
 
MacDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Planet Earth.....on FASTER boil :-(
Posts: 30,834
Post

Doubt there will be more than one dual.

Far more likely 1.8 will be entry

2.X single in the middle

2.X dual on top.

733 no cache 933 2 meg cache DP 1 gHz

The second processor is wasted in many situations - look for more variation in the peripherals.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
__________________
In Australia and the web site is out of date.
Lots of good deals on Retinas, previous high end MacPros and current MacPro 6 core bundles in stock. [email protected]
MacDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 9th, 2003, 10:48 PM   #9
Full Citizen
 
Timothy J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto'City Core'
Posts: 273
Post

quote:
I don't think that's even worth complaing over. Yes, the PC has far, far more graphics cards than the Mac has, but 3/4 of their options are cheap, crap or completely no-name brand video cards - so who cares? They have more options, but they also have far more junk options as well. Apple only has some of the best graphics cards in their Macs.
--------------------------------------------------
I realise that a large percentage of the graphics cards may be **** or no name brands for PC's. But having choice of more than 2 manufacturers (ATI & nVidia) may make for some competition on our platform. Monopolies make for complacency. The nVidia cards shipping in the new G5's are not even the middle ground cards from nVidia they are the entry level cards. Competition between more companies usually benifits the consumer. I think I would be smart enough to know how to NOT buy a piece of crap graphics card for my MAC. I would only change the graphics card my MAC came with if it was a step up in quality. Call me a dreamer but I want more control of my options.
__________________
24"iMac 2.8gHz/17"powerbook 1.67gHz/iMac G4 800 mHz 15" LCD/1.0gHz Titanium G4/Pismo 500mHz powerbook/powerbook 1400 (still use every day)/20 GIG iPod/Video iPod
Timothy J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10th, 2003, 02:14 AM   #10
Full Citizen
 
Goobernatorial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 232
Post

Quote:
Far more likely 1.8 will be entry

2.X single in the middle

2.X dual on top.

733 no cache 933 2 meg cache DP 1 gHz
Assuming the 733,933,and 1ghz refer to frontside bus speed.

The frontside bus speed on the 970's are all half of the processor speed, so they would scale up with the newer processors. So it Apple put out a 3ghz G5 they would have a 1.5ghz bus. You would never have a 2+ghz processor with a sub-1ghz bus.

Thats why the
1.6 has a 800mhz bus
1.8 has a 900mhz
2.0 has a 1ghz bus.

I seriously doubt Apple would stray from this principle in the future, it is one of the key reasons why th G5's are so fast.
Goobernatorial is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple service request charging for shipping iPod, though under 6 months! mojoprofilms All iOS - iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, Apple TV & iTunes 8 Aug 28th, 2005 10:49 PM
iPhoto book pricing! ianmcc Anything Mac 0 Jun 3rd, 2005 12:34 AM
Want to Buy a new Powerbook...need help pricing current laptop kissenger Anything Mac 1 Apr 18th, 2005 10:26 AM
Photoshop - Educational Pricing The Doug Anything Mac 8 Mar 21st, 2005 08:55 PM
Just a pricing rant Zipper Anything Mac 8 Jul 8th, 2004 06:02 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999 - 2012, ehMac.ca All rights reserved. ehMac is not affiliated with Apple Inc. Mac, iPod, iTunes, iPhone, Apple TV are trademarks of Apple Inc. Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2

Tribe.ca: Urban living in Toronto!