Poor wireless performance - ehMac.ca
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jun 1st, 2005, 11:35 PM   #1
New Neighbour
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5
Poor wireless performance

I was wondering if there were any sort of tweaks that can improve the wireless networking between my G4 PB (AE WirelessG) & G3 PB (Airport Card WirelessB).

I can surf the net very fast and from prior testing, Rogers has been kind enough to grant me around 350kb/sec transfer rates. The reception on both PBs is always at 4 bars and I'm using the NetGear 4-port 802.11g router. The only problem that I have is improving file transfer speeds between the two machines. I use to have WEP enabled, but I've heard that it causes poor performance. I've since disabled that and just setup an access list to allow certain MAC addresses to logon.

Now the weird part is if I use the Network feature to mount one of the computers, the transfer rate on a 10mb file is 2mins. If I access the computer via FTP, the 10mb transfer improves to 1:36mins. That's very weird and if there are any wireless networking gurus, I'm all ears on your opinions.

The wireless router's distance is not far at all, but it should not be much of a factor since the signal indicator is always full.

Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
ChocolateMonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old Jun 2nd, 2005, 11:25 AM   #2
Club Vertigo Resident DJ
 
Vexel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Nova Scotia
Posts: 5,521
Wireless can be finicky, it depends on many things, you might try to do the FTP and it could come out around the same next time you do it. My suggestion, for performance and speed would be to actually get a small crossover cable to put between the PB's since they are both wireless. The transfer rate on Wireless B is terribly slow between machines on a network, your performance would surely improve if you use an actual crossover cable.

Other than that, if you want to keep it wireless, you will have to deal with up and down speeds... there are many things which can interfere with wireless.

If you get a program which will tell you your actual wireless signal in percentage, you will see what I mean. Check out MacStumbler or iStumbler.
__________________
13" 2.4Ghz ('10) Macbook Pro

http://soundcloud.com/vexelmusic (DJ Sets)
Vexel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2nd, 2005, 08:17 PM   #3
Full Citizen
 
Willy Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: France -> Peterborough->Montreal -> Vanuatu, South Pacific -> New Zealand...
Posts: 288
Send a message via AIM to Willy Z
When mixing B and G cards, the router will automatically swith to the slowest one.
"a chain is only as strong as its weakest link..."


FTP is a very effective way to communicate.
it makes a complete, and good use of the TCP/IP implementation, and it only does that.

when you mount the drive in Finder, it uses TCP/IP as well now, but mixes it with Rendez vous, which I think is based on the SAMBA protocol. (don't hesitate to correct me if I'm wrong).
because of that, it carries more information as the more infos, the more work...

And this has nothing to do with WIFI.
it would be the same using a good old wired connection.
__________________
For every problem, there is a solution...
...if there is no solution, it means there is no problem.
Willy Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3rd, 2005, 12:49 PM   #4
New Neighbour
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5
Hey guys,

Thanks for your valuable input. I appreciate it much. Perhaps the mixing of B & G cards isn't that well liked between the two computers. But it's just weird that the OS can maintain a fast connection to the internet, via the wireless router, but cannot communicate to each other effectively when there's no bandwidth limit from the ISP.

My ISP is like 3mbps, while a max .11b card is 11mbps, but it seems so much slower...feels like about 50kb/sec transfer rates between wireless machines.

Nevertheless, I'll just stick with using target disk mode, since they're both portables.

But, is there a way of tweaking the settings of the wireless adapters so there's not so much overhead? I remember in a windows machines, we would jump into the registry and adjust specific values to increase the flow of data. I know, it would be really tricky, but it's worth a shot.

Thanks again.
ChocolateMonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
performance benefit of HD raid array? rollee Mac, iPhone, iPad and iPod Help & Troubleshooting 2 Sep 8th, 2005 05:10 PM
PowerBook and LaCie HD performance zer0army Mac, iPhone, iPad and iPod Help & Troubleshooting 1 Jul 15th, 2005 10:02 PM
mac mini hard drive performance upgrade retrocactus Anything Mac 12 May 21st, 2005 04:08 PM
Raiding for Performance! MasterBlaster Anything Mac 3 Sep 26th, 2003 11:43 AM
Major Performance Bump - Under $300! Mississauga Anything Mac 5 Jun 7th, 2003 12:04 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:11 PM.



Copyright © 1999 - 2012, ehMac.ca All rights reserved. ehMac is not affiliated with Apple Inc. Mac, iPod, iTunes, iPhone, Apple TV are trademarks of Apple Inc. Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2

Tribe.ca: Urban living in Toronto!