OK, I thought that some broad observations would suffice. However, if you want it dissected, here goes:
My observation about you going on was
entirely about your statement:
...Donald gropes every vajayjay that he can get his hands on..
That's pure, undiluted bull$h!t & you know it.
There is plenty to be critical of & you resort to this kind of childish garbage. You're better than that. Nor did it have anything to do with "talking to oneself".
Period.
As an aside, I don't care if anyone responds to a post I make or not. I'm not trying to be the most-replied-to-guy on these boards. I know by watching the Views column that people are reading what I post and even if they don't reply I know many are tacitly agreeing with me. That's confirmation enough.
That is hilarious. I like to go on??? You talk basically to yourself in at least a couple of threads that next to no one replies to and I like to go on!!!?? Seriously???
I may call her Bill's Wife but everything I have posted about her is legitimate criticism. I challenge you to find otherwise.
Same goes for any other politician I have criticized. Go for it.
Played with a name? You bet. Guilty.
That is again hilarious, you are all about childish ad hominem garbage whether it be HC or any other politician you don't like.
Again: quote a post of mine where my criticism is not legit. Show me the
ad hom attacks.
You may not agree with it, but that does not make it any less legitimate.
So don't try and pretend that you are taking the "high" road, you wouldn't even know how to get there.
I make no apologies for my signature. Told you that before.
If it makes people smile, it's working. If it pi$$es people off, it's working, too. Don't like it? Go to Preferences & turn sigs off. You're welcome.
Your signature says it all and you are goddamn proud of it!
Go ahead. Speak your mind. Ain't trying to stop you. Just a helpful hint that frothing at the mouth lends nothing to your credibility.
You are just a constant provocateur and **** disturber and that is fine but don't try and call me out for speaking my mind and saying "you do go on"...
I explained above why I felt you were going on & on. Has nothing to do with how much you post about any topic. Post away.
If you have an issue with anything I've posted anywhere, I'd appreciate a reasoned response. Feel free. Or not. As you wish.
...when you go on and on and on and on ad infinitum in the "Anti-progressive thread.
Nope. I just want it to be real & to make sense. The statement in question was neither.
You seem to think that you can talk all kinds of chite to other people, but when (at least I) talk strongly back to you, you say:
What fake news? Again, if you have issues with a post I make, let's talk about it. Don't let it sit there & fester until it comes boiling to the top like this one obviously has.
Bring it. Level any legitimate criticism you want. Facts are required.
And, I've no idea what Trump likes & doesn't like. Don't know the man personally.
Your domination of a thread with "fake news"? See it is a double edged sword, one that you and Donald don't seem to appreciate.
Yes, I'm familiar with the slang term. In all the reports I read about Trump's comment, never once did I read the term, vajajay. It's certainly not the word he is reported to have used.
Re: the use of Vajayjay. You know what it means, you ever heard of the word "slang"?
The iron... You used the slang, not me. It's not the sort of term that an intelligent adult would use in mature conversation & it certainly is not accurate to the quote. It's beneath you. That is my issue with the use.
Christ man you grow up! You want to talk about not "helping" drop the derogatory language by basically saying that my level of discourse is that of a 12 year old.
Well, real or not, he's really there. For the next 4 years & probably more.
It is hard to keep it real when Trump is President and that is of his own making, because there is nothing real about the man or what he has to say.
Really? Well, I'd certainly like to read more about that. Got a link to a scientific study detailing exactly why he's unfit to be President? Conducted by someone who has actually spoken to Trump?
'Cause if it's jes' the Court of Public Opinion, it's merely an
ad hominem attack. Don't waste my time & don't cheapen your own credibility...
It is in the public record that the man is not fit to be the President of the USA.