Both Hoover and FDR were meddling staists who felt that they could "manage" the economy and promote economic growth through government largesse. Neither had any relevant solutions to the fiscal crisis of the 1930s because they were responsible for it.
So the questions of what I would have done? Some essentials:
1. Although it had already wreaked havoc with the stock market, immediate repeal of the Smoot-Hawley tariff.
2. Immediate end to agricultural supply management, which raised prices for hard-hit consumers.
3. Allow wages to fall to the levels of new economic reality which would have increased employment for all, instead of sustaining a 20% unemployment rate for a decade at unrealistic fixed wages.
4. Immediate repeal of the National Industrial Recovery Act, which exempted industries from antitrust prosecution
OK, fair enough. Your Congress has repealed these acts ................ but now what of the real human suffering that is going on throughout the US?
Now, with Smoot-Hawley gone, American exports and imports, which were reduced by more than half, may now flow again ................. except there is not the money to buy these goods and millions are out of work who once produced these goods.
Now, no more agricultural supplements .............. so more farmers go under and there are less food to go around ................ which raises prices to everyone (unless you shall also suspend the reality of "supply and demand").
You can't repeal the National Industrial Recovery Act, since it was FDR that brought in this act to help establish a national public works program (thus, no NRA or WPA, which helped millions upon millions of people).
Wages now fall to record lows, with riots to get the few jobs that now exist at less than subsistance levels. The union movement is crushed, but millions of unemployed workers who refuse to work for "slave wages" begin to organize in a mass movement (remember what Hoover faced with the "Bonus March" of 1931. What you shall face makes this look like a bunch of boy scouts.)
So, you have riots and starvation in your first hundred days. At least FDR DID something during these 100 days. You have done less than Hoover (at least he had Hoovervilles named after him as a sign of the shacks that sprung up in public parks to house the homeless).
Bottom line, you have proposed nothing of substance. The situation is getting worse and you are wondering what do to.
Mock FDR and his "accomplishments" if you want, but there are still people alive today who will tell you that they are alive because of FDR's programs.
You are merely the 32nd president .................. and I strongly doubt you shall be re-elected three more times.
Sorry, mon ami, FDR was FAR better for the people of the US than you if this is all you propose.
Paix, mon ami.