eBay scammer on Judge Judy - ehMac.ca
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Oct 3rd, 2009, 07:22 AM   #1
Honourable Citizen
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Southern Saskatchewan
Posts: 5,350
Send a message via Skype™ to winwintoo
eBay scammer on Judge Judy

Gotta love Judge Judy

+ YouTube Video
ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.
winwintoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old Oct 3rd, 2009, 11:32 AM   #2
Full Citizen
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 904
How will they make her pay the $5,000? I hate people like that smug and stupid a great combination, I would have liked to see and hear her husband that probably would have had me trying to reach for his neck.

John
jlcinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3rd, 2009, 11:56 AM   #3
Canadian By Choice
 
Dr.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador
Posts: 79,025
I have to admit that I have never watched JJ on TV. However, why might a person bring a case to her? Does she have any actual legal standing/jurisdiction to force this fine?
__________________
Dr.G.
14" G4 iBook
15" MacBook Pro (July, 2009)
13" MacBooK Pro with Retina Display
Paix
"The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who can't read these books." Mark Twain
Dr.G. is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3rd, 2009, 12:06 PM   #4
Honourable Citizen
 
bsenka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Winterpeg
Posts: 1,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlcinc View Post
How will they make her pay the $5,000? I hate people like that smug and stupid a great combination, I would have liked to see and hear her husband that probably would have had me trying to reach for his neck.

John
Defendants don't pay the judgements on Judge Judy, they GET PAID to appear. That's why they agree to go through the humiliation.

Also, this would probably not have succeeded in a real court, because the auction clearly does say that it's for the picture only. It's dirty for sure, but a lot of people do things like this on ebay, you have to read the whole auction before bidding.
__________________
iPad 32GB w 3G / iPod Classic 160GB / iPod shuffle 2GB / iPod Touch 4 32GB.

Mac Pro 8-Core 2.8GHz , 23" Cinema HD Display, medium Intuos4. / 20" iMac 2.4GHz w. 22" LG matte side display and 15" Cintiq

HP Mini "hackbook"
bsenka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3rd, 2009, 01:19 PM   #5
Honourable Citizen
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsenka View Post
Defendants don't pay the judgements on Judge Judy, they GET PAID to appear. That's why they agree to go through the humiliation.

Also, this would probably not have succeeded in a real court, because the auction clearly does say that it's for the picture only. It's dirty for sure, but a lot of people do things like this on ebay, you have to read the whole auction before bidding.
yes, i think the maximum damages the plaintiff can be rewarded is the same as how much they get paid, so by appearing on the show the worst the defendant can make out is even. Also i think they have to sign something that they agree to the judges decision and can't bring further legal claims.

Regarding your 2nd point, i think you're off. The auction listed the physical characteristics of a cell phone, so even if the auction says "you're bidding on the photo only" there is a conflict in what is being stated.

Furthermore, even if you DO buy the "photo only" angle, the plaintiff STILL has a claim that she was sent a PRINT OUT, and not a PHOTO.

I don't see how any court could ever side with the defendant.
i-rui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3rd, 2009, 01:32 PM   #6
Full Citizen
 
Carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cole Harbour, NS
Posts: 480
Send a message via AIM to Carter Send a message via MSN to Carter Send a message via Yahoo to Carter Send a message via Skype™ to Carter
"if you created children together, that's out ragous"
Carter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3rd, 2009, 01:32 PM   #7
Honourable Citizen
 
chas_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 11,796
Send a message via AIM to chas_m
Just FYI: it is standard practice in these sorts of shows, both parties have signed an agreement dropping their genuine legal action in favour of accepting the terms of the show, some of which have been spelled out in other posts. Interns scour the public notices of the small-claims courts to find "interesting" conflicts, approach the parties and see if they can get them to agree to drop the action in favour of being on TV/definitely getting at least some money or free trip out of it.
chas_m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 3rd, 2009, 02:39 PM   #8
Honourable Citizen
 
bsenka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Winterpeg
Posts: 1,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by i-rui View Post
yes, i think the maximum damages the plaintiff can be rewarded is the same as how much they get paid, so by appearing on the show the worst the defendant can make out is even. Also i think they have to sign something that they agree to the judges decision and can't bring further legal claims.

Regarding your 2nd point, i think you're off. The auction listed the physical characteristics of a cell phone, so even if the auction says "you're bidding on the photo only" there is a conflict in what is being stated.

Furthermore, even if you DO buy the "photo only" angle, the plaintiff STILL has a claim that she was sent a PRINT OUT, and not a PHOTO.

I don't see how any court could ever side with the defendant.
These guys are pretty careful in how they word the auctions so that it definitely says something other than what it first appears to. Judy wouldn't stop shrieking long enough to read the whole thing, she couldn't even find where it said 'picture only'. What they typically do is have a line where it says something to the effect of "here is a description of the item that you are buying a picture of".

I know for a fact that courts do regularly side with the defendant in such cases, because I know people who have been taken by this exact scam. They are particularly prevalent close to christmas when there is some hot new item that all the stores are sold out of. When the Wii was in short supply, there were loads of these kinds of auctions. Read the whole auction before bidding!!!
__________________
iPad 32GB w 3G / iPod Classic 160GB / iPod shuffle 2GB / iPod Touch 4 32GB.

Mac Pro 8-Core 2.8GHz , 23" Cinema HD Display, medium Intuos4. / 20" iMac 2.4GHz w. 22" LG matte side display and 15" Cintiq

HP Mini "hackbook"
bsenka is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Founders Seek to Buy Skype Back From EBay Adrian. Everything Else, eh! 4 Apr 11th, 2009 12:45 PM
ebay advice Clockwork Everything Else, eh! 10 Dec 15th, 2008 05:19 PM
Bad Ebay Experience buying an Airport Extreme Deep Blue Anything Mac 23 Jun 4th, 2006 08:34 AM
eBay scam warning MacDaddy Everything Else, eh! 6 Dec 14th, 2004 01:51 PM
L'affaire eBay (( p g )) Everything Else, eh! 17 Mar 27th, 2003 12:25 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 PM.



Copyright © 1999 - 2012, ehMac.ca All rights reserved. ehMac is not affiliated with Apple Inc. Mac, iPod, iTunes, iPhone, Apple TV are trademarks of Apple Inc. Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2

Tribe.ca: Urban living in Toronto!