So pointing out that Harper would like to scrap Kyoto is a waste of time?
Explain to me why this would not be of importance? Overall, in my region we are supporters of the Kyoto treaty - we even had a conference on it lately.
Or do you think that this should be a non issue?
Harper was kind to repeat that he would scrap Kyoto and allow US missile defence shield in Canada during a French Television interview. These are values that Canadians should be aware about the Cons.
The more this campaign goes on, the more Harper feels like GW Bush jr....
We're not losing anything.... yet? Polls change all the time and there is still time enough left for the Canadian people to wake up and realise how scary Harper is www.harperwatch.ca
__________________ 17" iMac Core Duo | OS 10.5.7 | 1.83 GHz Core Duo | 1 GB RAM | 250 GB | Superdrive
13.3" Unibody Macbook | OS 10.5.7 | 2.0Ghz Core 2 Duo | 2 GB RAM | 150GB | Superdrive
iPhone 3G 16GB (White)
AppleTV
Boy, you guys rally get PO'd when you're losing, don't you?
SINC, you are the first to ask for a little decorum and sound like such a sore winner...
So what's would happen to Kyoto under Harper? Scrapped or not?
Does it not resemble American policy?
Missile shield under Harper- back or not?
How will it affect or independence from the US? Will it not give the impression that we are just one of there puppet states?
(notice that these are direct questions, feel free to answer)
Ah, another waste of time. Give AS the award for being the biggest dumb multiple thread starter of all time.
And to think that this thread was serious.
I do find it amusing that you would comment on "dumb multiple thread starter" when all evening you have made effort to derail every thread where I have posted. These include mostly threads that I have not started. See image.
And, please note that instead of blindly trying to derail anything you may have written, I have been gentlemanly enough to actually read and follow your statements.
Last edited by ArtistSeries; Jan 13th, 2006 at 01:51 AM.
I do find it amusing that you would comment on "dumb multiple thread starter" when all evening you have made effort to derail every thread where I have posted. These include most that I have not started. See image.
And, please note that instead of blindly trying to derail anything you may have written, I have been gentlemanly enough to actually read and follow what your statements.
Given the disjointed language of this post, perhaps put a cork in that bottle?
Linear Mode
