CubaMark
Jul 3rd, 2004, 08:07 AM
Does anyone still read that right-wing rag anymore?
Writer fabricated names, quotes, National Post says
By*GLORIA GALLOWAY
From Saturday's Globe and Mail (http://www.globeandmail.ca/servlet/story/RTGAM.20040702.wpost3/BNStory/National/)
A medical reporter at the National Post has left the newspaper after it learned that stories he had written allegedly contained fabricated names and quotes.
A note to readers on Page 2 of yesterday's Post said nine articles by Brad Evenson, a senior journalist at the paper who has won awards for his stories about medical research, contained false information.
"The Post takes this seriously and it is not in any way indicative of the quality of reporting and editing at the newspaper," Post editor Matthew Fraser said in the five-paragraph note to readers that offered no apology for the breach of journalistic ethics. Mr. Fraser was unavailable for comment yesterday and no other Post executive would talk about the incident.
The paper said that the articles in question, which date back to December, 2002, contained quotes that "were either the result of other conversations, Internet exchanges or readings but they were not made by the people cited.":rolleyes:
M
Writer fabricated names, quotes, National Post says
By*GLORIA GALLOWAY
From Saturday's Globe and Mail (http://www.globeandmail.ca/servlet/story/RTGAM.20040702.wpost3/BNStory/National/)
A medical reporter at the National Post has left the newspaper after it learned that stories he had written allegedly contained fabricated names and quotes.
A note to readers on Page 2 of yesterday's Post said nine articles by Brad Evenson, a senior journalist at the paper who has won awards for his stories about medical research, contained false information.
"The Post takes this seriously and it is not in any way indicative of the quality of reporting and editing at the newspaper," Post editor Matthew Fraser said in the five-paragraph note to readers that offered no apology for the breach of journalistic ethics. Mr. Fraser was unavailable for comment yesterday and no other Post executive would talk about the incident.
The paper said that the articles in question, which date back to December, 2002, contained quotes that "were either the result of other conversations, Internet exchanges or readings but they were not made by the people cited.":rolleyes:
M