Imtoast
Apr 17th, 2012, 02:08 AM
I am a heavy VM user and I have been using a sparse bundle to house all of my VMs so I can control their size allocation. One thing I do know is that TM will backup incrementally to my FW800 drive of any changed bands within the bundle which is a huge benefit for me. One thing that concerns me is does it make any difference in the backup if the sparse bundle is currently mounted when TM backs up the system? What about the locked bands for writing? I would assume at the next schedule the locked bands would eventually get backed up.
Every morning, I turn on my MBP and then connect my FW800 drives. I have one for SD to do the full copy of the system and another for TM. Both drives are the same size as the internal drive 750GB. In any event I am double sure about recovering from a dead internal hard drive. When SD clones the drive, it does does the complete backup of the system with the sparse bundle not mounted and the same goes for TM. Once complete I then mount the sparse bundle and use the VMs inside of it. I leave TM to do its thing during the day until I turn off the MBP.
So the question is, is it better to backup a sparse bundle when its not mounted or mounted?
Thanks
ImToast
Every morning, I turn on my MBP and then connect my FW800 drives. I have one for SD to do the full copy of the system and another for TM. Both drives are the same size as the internal drive 750GB. In any event I am double sure about recovering from a dead internal hard drive. When SD clones the drive, it does does the complete backup of the system with the sparse bundle not mounted and the same goes for TM. Once complete I then mount the sparse bundle and use the VMs inside of it. I leave TM to do its thing during the day until I turn off the MBP.
So the question is, is it better to backup a sparse bundle when its not mounted or mounted?
Thanks
ImToast