|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Full Citizen
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 125
|
iMac 20" or 24"
I was waiting for iMac refresh for the past two months. Now that the new iMacs are released, I can finally make the decision to buy refurb. But which one?
iMac 20-inch 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 20-inch glossy widescreen display 2GB memory 320GB hard drive 8x SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO with 256MB memory or iMac 24-inch 2.8GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 24-inch glossy widescreen display 2GB memory 320GB hard drive 8x SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW) ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO with 256MB memory The most noticable difference is 2-inch of display. I am sure I won't notice the 0.2GHz CPU difference. My question is, is it worth the extra $200? I heard some bad things about the 20-inch display so I am slightly inclinded to buy the 24-incher, although at this point, the wife is convinced that it would be too big for our desk. Thanks for your attention and intelligent input.
__________________
MacBook Pro Intel Core Duo 1.83GHz/2GB RAM/80GB HD |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Honourable Citizen
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 3,486
|
I do my panel rant again...
The 20" iMac has a 6-bit TN Panel LCD screen. Otherwise it's great, and probably more computer than anyone who uses it ever needs. The 24" iMac has an 8-bit PVA Panel LCD. It's a way better quality, can actually display more colours (without dithering), displays more accurate colours, and has way better viewing angles. Here's a picture of a TN beside a PVA for viewing angles... the colours and brightness all drop off significantly when you're at all off-axis.
__________________
Steve Jobs re: iTunes on Windows: "It's like giving a glass of ice water to somebody in hell"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Honourable Citizen
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,963
|
__________________
Do NOT Touch this computer!!! Touching this computer WILL cause irreversible brain damage. Last edited by eMacMan; Mar 4th, 2009 at 11:51 AM. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#4 |
|
Full Citizen
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 37
|
I bought the 20" after months of indecision and I made the wrong decision. Thankfully, Apple is saving my butt and letting me exchange it for a 24" (refreshed model no less) well beyond their exchange period.
Why the 24"? Screen Screen Screen. Size really does matter on this one. Additionally, if you love iPhoto and work with any mass of images the extra square inches and resolution will matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Full Citizen
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 125
|
Thanks, guys. Your comments did help me make a sound decision.
__________________
MacBook Pro Intel Core Duo 1.83GHz/2GB RAM/80GB HD |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New Neighbour
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 19
|
Ohhh the $1399 price tag on that makes it so appealing. I would definitely go for the 24" for the difference in the screen alone, let alone the faster processor. Too bad I don't need a new desktop right now! I will seriously consider a refurbished product next time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Honourable Citizen
|
Fyrefly:
Thanks for bringing a level of realism and accuracy to the "here we go again" issue of 6-bit v 8-bit screens. As most computer users do not spend much time looking at their computers at odd angles, this is not as big an issue as some people make out for typical users. But for people who need something better than yer basic LCD, the 8-bit screens are visibly a better choice.
__________________
Cheers chas_m Evangelist, ACDSee Pro for Mac: Get the beta! Join the community! Help us build the next great Mac photo manager! Our life in Victoria BC • Music blog • My Podcast • Film blog Victoria Macintosh Users Group |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Full Citizen
|
In a related question, I've read that 6 bit panels have faster refresh rates than 8 bit panels. How does this manifest itself in real world computing? Is there ghosting when watching videos on the 24" iMac? Depending on the OP's needs, this may be a factor...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Honourable Citizen
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,963
|
I have seen a 20" iMac side by side with a 24" iMac. Both had the same desktop image but the 20" showed a halo effect in areas that were clean gradients on the 24". Problem becomes more obvious when you use PC rather than Mac gamma setting. If you are working with photos you should of course use PC gamma settings as prints from your printer or your favourite photo lab will come much closer to matching your display. Also a good idea if you email photos to Windozed friends.
__________________
Do NOT Touch this computer!!! Touching this computer WILL cause irreversible brain damage. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Neighbour
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18
|
imac 20" vrs 24"
Hello!
I was in the imac frame of mind a few years ago. I was tired at looking at my smaller Apple LCD screen from my Power Mac G4 (466Mhz) I decided to buy the Imac 24" Dual Core 2.8Ghz model instead of the smaller 20"imac. There is no problem with screen glare, or Ilife programs. I have been using idvd, itunes, iphoto this machine really is amazing. I don't know you budget, but I quite enjoy the larger 24" screen to preview DVDs & photos! Hope this helps! May the imac be with you G4Ever
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| For Sale 24" IMac - 2.4Ghz, 4G RAM, 320G HD | Dave K | Mac Desktops | 0 | Feb 21st, 2009 03:48 PM |
| Price check: iMac G5 20" | archimed | Anything Mac | 3 | Jan 13th, 2007 12:14 PM |
| Help me decide between 20" and 24" iMac | ablatt | Anything Mac | 5 | Jan 3rd, 2007 02:12 PM |
| Cost of a Dell XPS M2010 vs. 20" iMac | zoziw | Anything Mac | 11 | Sep 10th, 2006 05:03 PM |
| Price/Interest Check: iMac G4 20" 1.25 ghz | CN | Anything Mac | 12 | Jan 12th, 2006 08:16 PM |