|
Quote: |
|
|
Originally Posted by josheejs |
|
|
|
|
the main concern that we have is that we have a program that:
1. is cheap (i.e. open source or something fairly reasonable...we don't have the means to continually upgrade)
2. is able to categorize photos and allow a (virtually) unlimited amount of customizable categories
3. is user friendly and capable of wading through all of these files to search for what we want |
|
|
|
|
1. Cheap is a relative term. If what you are using is currently worth $100,000 to upgrade, $10,000 is cheap. On the other hand if what you have is a $1500 system, $10,000 is not so cheap. I know that there are digital asset managemet systems that are worth a lot. So more info on the front would be helpful. It does however sound as if your needs are not that great.
2. Filemaker Pro will do all of this. You could have as many descriptive fields as you like.
3. It has probably the most user friendly search engine available. Set up a form when you make the program. the user will then enter find mode, enter data in the form and find it. Complicated And/Or and Omit searches are supported with various wild cards available.
The minimum system requirements are Mac OS X 10.3 I believe and XP SP2. Yes it is cross platform so both windows and mac machines could see the database at the same time on a network.
It is flexible in that you can change the program to meet changing needs. That is one of it's strengths. Development time is also fairly good compared to other choices for doing it yourself.
Regarding your earlier post, Filemaker can be deployed over a WAN or via web. I have two solutions now running via WAN. The number of people involved will influence the cost of deployment as with over 5 people you require the server version which does cost some money. Each work station requires a copy of the desktop application if doing a direct database deployment.
It has container fields that will import jpegs no problem. I would have to check the specs but I do believe that word documents can be inserted also. It is also possible to call the actual file up and have it open in it's own application. Good if everyone has the same programs. Not so good if applications are not widely distributed throughout the company. Also I am not sure just how good this would be in a cross platform environment where the file paths differ depending on platform.
This gives you something to work with anyway.
HTH
Dave McQueen